Memory and Continual Learning: Engram's Dan Biderman and Jessy Lin

Dan Biderman and Jessy Lin of Engram introduce their "always training" paradigm, focusing on baking a team's knowledge directly into a model's weights to achieve true memory and continual learning. This contrarian approach, which they call a "RAG killer" for specific use cases, promises up to 100x token savings and superior performance by internalizing context rather than relying on ever-larger context windows or external retrieval, envisioning a future where everyone has their own continually learning, personalized AI model.

2 min read
Memory and Continual Learning: Engram's Dan Biderman and Jessy Lin
source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiR7F4jqjXY

Engram, co-founded by Dan Biderman and Jessy Lin, posits that memory and continual learning represent the true bottleneck in making AI models more useful, rather than raw intelligence. Their core premise, dubbed “always training,” advocates for deeply baking specific knowledge into a model’s weights, analogous to how pre-training imprints general knowledge, instead of relying heavily on context windows or Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG).

Internalizing Knowledge vs. Externalization

The current industry standard for providing models with new information involves extensive context engineering, such as crafting large prompts or using multi-turn conversations. While recognizing the utility of such tools, Engram argues this approach falls short of true memory and continual learning. They highlight two main issues with externalized memory:

  1. Cost and Complexity: The sheer volume of tokens generated daily (potentially tens of millions per individual) makes searching and re-reading computationally expensive and confusing for models without significant breakthroughs.
  2. Lack of Deep Understanding: Simply providing context at test time doesn’t allow models to internalize information. An experienced employee understands company-wide initiatives, processes, and culture implicitly, a level of understanding that superficial context provision cannot achieve.

Engram’s Approach and Architecture

Engram’s solution involves training

Share post

Stay In The Loop! Subscribe to Our Newsletter.

Get updates straight to your inbox. No spam, just useful content.

Recommended for You

The Algorithm That IS The Scientific Method [Dr. Jeff Beck]

The Algorithm That IS The Scientific Method [Dr. Jeff Beck]

Dr. Jeff Beck argues that the future of AI lies not in scaling up large language models, but in building systems that mirror the brain's approach to understanding the world. He posits that true intelligence is grounded in physics and object-centered models, not language. Beck's vision involves creating AI composed of numerous small, modular models—much like a video game engine—that can be dynamically combined, updated through continual learning, and understand the world through causal relationships and forces. This approach, he claims, will solve key challenges in generalization, robotics, and alignment by enabling machines to 'know what they don't know' and reason about the physical world in a way that is fundamentally similar to humans.

⚡️Every product of the future will be a living system  — Ronak Malde, Trajectory.ai

⚡️Every product of the future will be a living system — Ronak Malde, Trajectory.ai

Ronuk Malde, CEO of Trajectory.ai, discusses his journey from building AI coding agents at Windsurf to his current focus on continual learning for enterprise AI. He shares insights on leveraging real-world user data, the unique challenges of model acquisition, and how Trajectory.ai's platform, powered by innovations like scaled SDPO and a novel training stack, enables dynamic, always-learning AI models for diverse industries from legal to finance.