A practitioner's guide to building a context engine, the reasoning layer that provides AI agents with the necessary organizational context to generate effective and appropriate code. The talk debunks common myths about RAG and large context windows, outlines core requirements for a robust context engine, and shares lessons learned from production.
![[FULL WORKSHOP] AI Coding For Real Engineers - Matt Pocock, AI Hero (@mattpocockuk )](https://img.youtube.com/vi/-QFHIoCo-Ko/maxresdefault.jpg)
A workshop on building a complete AI-assisted development workflow, covering how to translate ambiguous requirements into agent-ready plans and run autonomous coding agents to ship production-ready features.
Gergely Orosz, author of The Pragmatic Engineer, discusses the bizarre trend of 'token maxing' in Big Tech, the evolving role of software engineers in the AI era, and why companies are heavily investing in internal AI infrastructure despite uncertain productivity gains.
Microsoft researchers unpack the New Future of Work Report 2025, exploring AI's real-world impact. They discuss adoption trends, the shift in job tasks, and the crucial distinction between viewing AI as a simple tool versus a collaborator. The conversation emphasizes moving beyond pure efficiency to consciously design a future where AI supports human flourishing and meaningful work.
Dexter Horthy of HumanLayer critiques the initial Research-Plan-Implement (RPI) framework for AI coding agents, revealing its tendency to encourage 'outsourcing thinking'. He introduces CRISPR, a new structured methodology that emphasizes smaller, focused prompts, human-agent alignment through artifacts like Design Discussions, and engineer ownership to combat 'slop' and improve code quality in complex projects.
fast.ai founder Jeremy Howard critiques the 'vibe coding' illusion, arguing that AI-assisted tools create a slot machine-like experience that erodes true software engineering skills. He revisits the origins of ULMFiT, champions interactive programming for building intuition, and reframes AI risk from existential threats to the dangers of power centralization and human enfeeblement.