Model monitoring

1,368 AI Failures and What They Teach About Evals — Vishal Srivastava & Tanmay Sah, New York Life

1,368 AI Failures and What They Teach About Evals — Vishal Srivastava & Tanmay Sah, New York Life

Vishal Srivastava and Tanmay Sah of New York Life analyze 1,368 public AI incidents to show what real failures reveal about how AI systems should be tested. They organize failures into three dimensions (technical strength, deployment controls, business impact) and 13 sub-dimensions covering about 98% of cases, find that weak deployment controls are most closely tied to harm, and present a materiality-based ranking of use cases, a failure-driven build-break-fix evaluation loop, and an airline chatbot refund case as an example.

Why 70% of Companies Are FAILING at AI Safety (Shocking Survey Data): 2025 AI Governance Survey:

Why 70% of Companies Are FAILING at AI Safety (Shocking Survey Data): 2025 AI Governance Survey:

Ben Lorica and David Talby of 'The Data Exchange' podcast analyze the 2025 AI Governance Survey, revealing a significant gap between AI adoption and mature risk management. While 30% of organizations have models in production, many lack robust governance frameworks, incident response plans, and comprehensive monitoring, often prioritizing speed-to-market over safety and compliance.